In A Class Of 100 Students, 57 Study German, 51 Study English, And 55 Study French. 27 Study German And English, 29 Study English And French, 13 Study German And French, And 11 Study All Three Languages. How Many Students Study None Of These Languages?

by ADMIN 253 views

Introduction

In the realm of mathematical problem-solving, set theory provides a powerful framework for analyzing collections of objects and their relationships. One common type of problem involves determining the number of elements in various overlapping sets. A classic example of this arises when considering students studying different languages. Let's delve into a specific scenario: In a course of 100 students, 57 study German, 51 study English, and 55 study French. Furthermore, 27 study German and English, 29 study English and French, 13 study German and French, and 11 study all three languages. The central question we aim to address is: How many students study none of these languages?

This problem is a quintessential example of an inclusion-exclusion principle application, a fundamental concept in combinatorics and set theory. To solve it effectively, we'll meticulously dissect the given information, represent it using Venn diagrams, and apply the principle to arrive at the final answer. Understanding the nuances of set intersections and unions is crucial for accurate problem-solving.

Defining the Sets and Their Intersections

To begin, let's define the sets representing students studying each language:

  • Let G represent the set of students studying German.
  • Let E represent the set of students studying English.
  • Let F represent the set of students studying French.

We are given the following information:

  • |G| = 57 (Number of students studying German)
  • |E| = 51 (Number of students studying English)
  • |F| = 55 (Number of students studying French)
  • |G ∩ E| = 27 (Number of students studying both German and English)
  • |E ∩ F| = 29 (Number of students studying both English and French)
  • |G ∩ F| = 13 (Number of students studying both German and French)
  • |G ∩ E ∩ F| = 11 (Number of students studying all three languages)

The notation |X| represents the cardinality of the set X, which is the number of elements in the set. The intersection symbol ∩ denotes the common elements between sets. For instance, G ∩ E represents the set of students studying both German and English.

The given information forms the foundation for our analysis. We must carefully consider these overlapping sets to avoid double-counting students when calculating the total number of students studying at least one language.

Applying the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle

The inclusion-exclusion principle provides a systematic way to count the elements in the union of multiple sets. For three sets, the principle states:

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = |G| + |E| + |F| - |G ∩ E| - |E ∩ F| - |G ∩ F| + |G ∩ E ∩ F|

This formula ensures that we accurately account for students studying multiple languages. We initially add the number of students in each individual language group. Then, we subtract the number of students in each pair of language groups to correct for double-counting. Finally, we add back the number of students in all three language groups, as they were subtracted three times (once for each pair).

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 57 + 51 + 55 - 27 - 29 - 13 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 163 - 69 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 94 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 105

This result indicates that 105 students are studying at least one of the three languages.

Calculating Students Studying None of the Languages

Now that we know the number of students studying at least one language, we can determine the number of students studying none of the languages. We are given that there are 100 students in total. Therefore, the number of students studying none of the languages is the difference between the total number of students and the number of students studying at least one language.

Number of students studying none = Total students - |G ∪ E ∪ F|

Number of students studying none = 100 - 105

Number of students studying none = -5

Wait a minute! A negative number of students doesn't make sense. This indicates an error in our calculation or the problem statement itself. Let's re-examine our steps to identify any potential mistakes.

Re-evaluating the Calculation

Let's double-check the application of the inclusion-exclusion principle:

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 57 + 51 + 55 - 27 - 29 - 13 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 163 - (27 + 29 + 13) + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 163 - 69 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 94 + 11

|G ∪ E ∪ F| = 105

The calculation seems correct. Let's consider another approach using a Venn diagram to visualize the sets and their intersections.

Visualizing with a Venn Diagram

A Venn diagram is a powerful tool for visualizing sets and their relationships. Let's draw a Venn diagram with three overlapping circles representing German (G), English (E), and French (F). We'll fill in the regions of the diagram step by step, starting with the intersection of all three sets.

  1. |G ∩ E ∩ F| = 11: This is the central region where all three circles overlap. Write 11 in this region.
  2. |G ∩ E| = 27: This region includes the 11 students who study all three languages. So, the number of students studying only German and English is 27 - 11 = 16. Write 16 in the appropriate region.
  3. |E ∩ F| = 29: Similarly, the number of students studying only English and French is 29 - 11 = 18. Write 18 in the corresponding region.
  4. |G ∩ F| = 13: The number of students studying only German and French is 13 - 11 = 2. Write 2 in the relevant region.

Now, let's calculate the number of students studying each language individually:

  1. German (G): 57 students. We've already accounted for students studying German with other languages. The number of students studying only German is 57 - 16 - 11 - 2 = 28. Write 28 in the appropriate region.
  2. English (E): 51 students. The number of students studying only English is 51 - 16 - 11 - 18 = 6. Write 6 in the corresponding region.
  3. French (F): 55 students. The number of students studying only French is 55 - 18 - 11 - 2 = 24. Write 24 in the relevant region.

Now, let's sum up all the numbers in the Venn diagram:

28 (Only G) + 6 (Only E) + 24 (Only F) + 16 (G and E) + 18 (E and F) + 2 (G and F) + 11 (All three) = 105

This confirms our previous calculation using the inclusion-exclusion principle. We still arrive at 105 students studying at least one language.

Identifying the Discrepancy and Correcting the Problem

The fact that we obtained 105 students studying at least one language, while there are only 100 students in total, indicates an inconsistency in the problem statement. It's mathematically impossible for more students to be studying languages than the total number of students in the course.

Therefore, there is likely an error in the given data.

To illustrate how we would proceed if the data were consistent, let's assume the number of students studying at least one language was, say, 90. Then, the number of students studying none of the languages would be:

Number of students studying none = 100 - 90 = 10

In this hypothetical scenario, 10 students would not be studying any of the three languages.

Conclusion

In this detailed exploration, we tackled a classic set theory problem involving language students. We meticulously applied the inclusion-exclusion principle and utilized a Venn diagram to visualize the relationships between different sets of students. While our calculations initially led to an inconsistency, highlighting a flaw in the problem's data, we demonstrated the systematic approach required to solve such problems. This exercise underscores the importance of not only applying mathematical principles correctly but also critically evaluating the validity of the given information. The inclusion-exclusion principle is a fundamental tool in combinatorics and set theory, and its proper application is crucial for accurate problem-solving. By understanding the nuances of set intersections and unions, we can effectively analyze and solve a wide range of problems involving overlapping sets. While this particular problem had an inconsistency, the methodology and steps we took remain valid and applicable to similar scenarios with accurate data. This detailed walkthrough should provide a comprehensive understanding of how to approach and solve problems of this nature.