Find The Minimum Value Of The Function F(x) = (x^2 + 8x + 17) / (x + 4) For X > -4.

by ADMIN 84 views

In this article, we will delve into the problem of finding the minimum possible value of the expression x2+8x+17x+4 \frac{x^2 + 8x + 17}{x + 4} } for x>−4{ x > -4 . This problem falls under the domain of calculus and optimization, where we aim to determine the smallest possible output of a function given certain constraints. We will explore different approaches to solve this problem, including algebraic manipulation and calculus-based methods. Understanding such optimization problems is crucial in various fields like engineering, economics, and computer science, where minimizing costs or maximizing efficiency is a primary concern.

Understanding the Problem

At the heart of this problem lies the need to find the minimum value of a given rational function. This involves identifying the critical points of the function and determining whether these points correspond to minima, maxima, or saddle points. The constraint x>−4{ x > -4 } is crucial because it restricts the domain of the function, potentially affecting the location and nature of the minimum value. This constraint is particularly important when dealing with rational functions, as it helps us avoid division by zero and other undefined scenarios. When working with mathematical problems of this nature, it is essential to first understand the behavior of the function within the given domain. This may involve analyzing the function's derivatives, plotting its graph, or using other analytical techniques. By understanding the function's behavior, we can more effectively identify potential minimum points and verify our solutions. In the context of optimization problems, the domain constraints often reflect real-world limitations or requirements, adding a layer of practical relevance to the mathematical analysis. For instance, in a resource allocation problem, the domain constraints might represent the available resources or the minimum required output. Similarly, in an engineering design problem, the constraints might represent physical limitations or safety requirements. Therefore, careful consideration of the domain is not only mathematically necessary but also crucial for interpreting the results in a meaningful way.

Algebraic Manipulation

One effective approach to solve this problem is through algebraic manipulation. We can rewrite the expression x2+8x+17x+4{ \frac{x^2 + 8x + 17}{x + 4} } by performing polynomial long division or by completing the square. This technique can simplify the expression and reveal its underlying structure, making it easier to analyze. Specifically, we can rewrite the numerator in terms of (x+4){ (x + 4) } to facilitate simplification. This often involves expressing the quadratic term as a combination of a linear term involving (x+4){ (x + 4) } and a constant term. For example, we can write x2+8x+17{ x^2 + 8x + 17 } as (x+4)2+1{ (x + 4)^2 + 1 }. By doing this, we can rewrite the original expression in a more manageable form that highlights the relationship between the numerator and the denominator. Once we have rewritten the expression, we can often apply other algebraic techniques, such as substitution or factoring, to further simplify it. These simplifications can reveal the key characteristics of the function, such as its minimum and maximum values, its asymptotes, and its overall behavior. In many cases, algebraic manipulation is the first step in solving optimization problems, as it can transform a complex expression into a simpler one that is easier to analyze using calculus or other mathematical tools. Moreover, algebraic manipulation can provide valuable insights into the structure and properties of the function, which can be useful for interpreting the results and understanding the underlying phenomena. In addition to simplifying the expression, algebraic manipulation can also help to identify any constraints or limitations on the variables, such as domain restrictions or inequalities. These constraints are crucial for ensuring that the solution is valid and meaningful within the given context.

By performing polynomial long division, we get:

x2+8x+17x+4=x+4+1x+4{ \frac{x^2 + 8x + 17}{x + 4} = x + 4 + \frac{1}{x + 4} }

Applying AM-GM Inequality

Now, we can use the Arithmetic Mean - Geometric Mean (AM-GM) inequality to find the minimum value. The AM-GM inequality states that for non-negative numbers a{ a } and b{ b }, the arithmetic mean is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean:

a+b2≥ab{ \frac{a + b}{2} \geq \sqrt{ab} }

Equality holds when a=b{ a = b }. In this case, we can apply the AM-GM inequality to the terms (x+4){ (x + 4) } and 1x+4{ \frac{1}{x + 4} }, since x>−4{ x > -4 }, both terms are positive. The AM-GM inequality is a powerful tool for solving optimization problems, particularly when dealing with expressions involving sums and products of variables. It provides a lower bound for the arithmetic mean of a set of numbers in terms of their geometric mean. This lower bound can be used to determine the minimum value of an expression subject to certain constraints. The key to applying the AM-GM inequality effectively is to identify a suitable set of terms for which the inequality can be applied. This often involves rewriting the expression in a form that highlights the sums and products of the relevant variables. In many cases, the AM-GM inequality can be combined with other algebraic techniques, such as substitution or completing the square, to further simplify the problem. The AM-GM inequality is widely used in various fields of mathematics, including number theory, geometry, and calculus. It has numerous applications in optimization problems, particularly in situations where we want to minimize a cost or maximize a profit. Moreover, the AM-GM inequality provides a valuable connection between the arithmetic and geometric means, which are fundamental concepts in mathematics. Understanding the AM-GM inequality and its applications is essential for solving a wide range of problems in various disciplines. In addition to its mathematical applications, the AM-GM inequality can also be used to model real-world phenomena, such as the distribution of resources or the growth of populations. In these applications, the AM-GM inequality can provide insights into the optimal allocation of resources or the maximum sustainable population size.

Applying AM-GM, we have:

(x+4)+1x+42≥(x+4)⋅1x+4{ \frac{(x + 4) + \frac{1}{x + 4}}{2} \geq \sqrt{(x + 4) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 4}} }

(x+4)+1x+42≥1{ \frac{(x + 4) + \frac{1}{x + 4}}{2} \geq 1 }

(x+4)+1x+4≥2{ (x + 4) + \frac{1}{x + 4} \geq 2 }

Finding the Minimum Value

Therefore, the minimum value of x+4+1x+4{ x + 4 + \frac{1}{x + 4} } is 2. This minimum value is achieved when x+4=1x+4{ x + 4 = \frac{1}{x + 4} }, which implies (x+4)2=1{ (x + 4)^2 = 1 }. Since x>−4{ x > -4 }, we have x+4=1{ x + 4 = 1 }, so x=−3{ x = -3 }. The process of finding the minimum value involves not only determining the lower bound but also identifying the conditions under which this bound is achieved. This often requires solving an equation or system of equations to find the values of the variables that correspond to the minimum value. In this case, we need to find the value of x{ x } that satisfies the equality condition of the AM-GM inequality, which is x+4=1x+4{ x + 4 = \frac{1}{x + 4} }. This equation can be solved by squaring both sides and then solving the resulting quadratic equation. However, it is crucial to consider the domain constraints when solving this equation. In this case, the constraint x>−4{ x > -4 } limits the possible solutions and ensures that the minimum value is achieved within the valid domain. The minimum value of the expression is not only a mathematical result but also a significant point in the graph of the function. It represents the lowest point on the curve within the specified domain. This graphical interpretation can provide a visual understanding of the minimum value and its relationship to the overall behavior of the function. Moreover, the minimum value can have practical implications in various applications, such as optimization problems in engineering, economics, and computer science. For example, the minimum value might represent the minimum cost of production, the minimum energy consumption, or the minimum execution time of an algorithm. Therefore, understanding how to find the minimum value of an expression is a valuable skill in various fields.

The minimum possible value of the given expression is 2, which occurs when x=−3{ x = -3 }.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have successfully determined the minimum possible value of the expression x2+8x+17x+4{ \frac{x^2 + 8x + 17}{x + 4} } for x>−4{ x > -4 }. We achieved this by using algebraic manipulation to rewrite the expression and then applying the AM-GM inequality. This approach highlights the power of combining different mathematical techniques to solve optimization problems. The final answer is 2, and this minimum value occurs when x=−3{ x = -3 }. The process of solving this problem has demonstrated the importance of understanding algebraic manipulation, inequality properties, and the conditions for achieving minimum or maximum values. These concepts are fundamental in calculus and optimization, and they have wide-ranging applications in various fields. By mastering these techniques, we can tackle more complex optimization problems and gain valuable insights into the behavior of functions and systems. Moreover, the ability to solve optimization problems is a crucial skill for decision-making in real-world scenarios, where we often need to find the best solution among a set of alternatives. Whether it's minimizing costs, maximizing profits, or optimizing resource allocation, the principles of optimization can help us make informed and effective decisions. Therefore, the knowledge and skills gained from solving problems like this are not only mathematically valuable but also practically relevant in various aspects of life.